Restroom Access
The vindictiveness of politics these days is really getting to be overwhelming. We’ve become numb to the idea that government can do anything helpful since President Reagan assured everyone that government was the problem and went about inspiring a generation of extremist politicians to prove that point. It’s come to the point that there is a significant number of people on both sides of the spectrum who think that we need to simply overthrow the current political system to either start from scratch or somehow live without any central authority to maintain the military, justice system, transportation system, public education, the social safety net, etc. But I didn’t realize quite how petty, shortsighted, and simply stupid the national discourse had become until I was struck with daily reports on bathroom bills and the ensuing controversies that have come about since their passage in states like North Carolina.
At a time when the United States has a significant debt and only barely manages to convince a majority of politicians to actually address the problems of debt ceilings, leave along deal with it responsibly; at a time when the United States is embroiled not only with an international struggle against the threats of terrorism, but the resulting refugee crises; at a time when national campaigns are inundated with countless fortunes by undisclosed special interests, and the polls are being ever more barricaded against honest citizens, some of the leaders of state governments have seen fit to enact legislation to monitor who uses a toilet. Apparently I had been blissfully unaware of the epidemic of transgendered people going to the restroom. Now maybe it’s because I have Crohn’s and so I am just keenly aware of the phenomenon, but these politicians are full of shit.
Researchers on both sides of the aisle have wracked their brains searching for any instance when a transgendered person ever used a protected status law to shield them from persecution for preying on small children, mostly because it’s virtually impossible to find an example of a real trans person abusing a child in a public restroom. What’s more the laws that have been passed are, by their own design, unenforceable because there is no fund set up to equip bathroom monitors to cover each and every lavatory door and demand birth certificates from those members of the public, who might dare to use a public restroom. These are punitive and petty measures that one might generously call a solution without a problem, but it is in fact a shell game covering up what the real problem was. The problem here was not that anyone was really disgusted when they went to a restroom to find they shared it with a transgendered person, because in my experience people tend not to make any eye contact in public restrooms, let alone take the time to scrutinize the original gender of all individuals in those restrooms. The problem was that a small subgroup of politically powerful religious activists felt that they’d been slighted by the advance of the LGBT communities and wanted to feel that they were on the right side of a battle that does not exist.
The thought seldom occurs to people these days, when it comes to politics, that it might be worthwhile to weigh what the real issues are and what responsible policies would be to solve those problems. Instead we are inundated with rhetoric that assures us that the only things worth fighting about are A) Who is to blame for any given problem and B) how can we punish them? On the Left we want to ask who is to blame for climate change, who is to blame for income inequality, and the answer is quite often a handful of moneyed conservative boogeymen like the Koch Brothers. On the Right the questions are usually more like who’s to blame for unemployment, who’s to blame for bloodshed, and the answer is quite often “foreign” groups like undocumented immigrants and Muslims. So we both design legislation that is designed not to solve the problem in either the long or short term, but to merely punish the people we blame and hope that the rest just sorts itself out. I do not pretend to be above this sort of thing, as I have most certainly found it satisfying to seek out appropriate scapegoats, but I am doing my best to stop because I see that it simply isn’t an effective problem solving strategy.
But it is also crucial that we do not let everyone off the hook by pretending that it’s a pox on both our houses and everyone bears the same amount of culpability. There clearly are people and groups of people in this country who are more responsible than others for pushing policies whose sole purpose is to hurt people and solve nothing. I am merely saying at this point it does us no good in the task of solving the real issues of our nation, and our planet for that matter, to devote all our time and energy giving into the retribution against those responsible. And these bathroom bills are the absolute bottom of the barrel, because if people were interested in solving even a small problem there is one that concerns restroom access.
It is a common occurrence to see restrooms in businesses marked with the notice “for employees only.” This makes sense, as it is private property and the proprietors want to limit the abuse of their property as much as possible. If you are the average person it can be a slight annoyance when you do have to go to find that you’ll have to keep looking for a place to go; however, there is a problem in America if you are someone who is routinely in situations where you simply cannot wait to find ever rarer public restrooms, in a country that routinely defunds anything public. I’m talking about the real Restroom Access Act or Ally’s Law. Several states from Massachusetts to Texas, but by no means a majority of states, have passed such laws that allow certain individuals with chronic bowel diseases to have access to restrooms of retail establishments when emergencies strike.
If this seems like a quite narrow issue to get hung up about, it certainly is. But when compared to the nonsense issue of these persecutory bathroom bills that do nothing to promote safety of children in practice, and serve only to further marginalize a group that is already more likely to face discrimination and violence on a daily basis, it is of monumental, real world importance. Yet this niche issue that would help real people is ignored and the disgraceful one that hurts real people is the one making constant news. And since we are going to waste days, weeks and longer on issues that do not even begin to tackle the larger problems we face as a society, it might as well be one that actually provides some relief to people.
I am perfectly willing to spend my time debating and negotiating in good faith with people who have significantly differing opinions than my own on issues of consequence, because that’s ultimately the only way we’re going to be able to come together as a society and create workable policy that most of us can at least stomach. I am not, however, willing to continually waste time on the vanity projects of those who simply want to punish people without a second’s thought on how to solve real problems. I am not, for instance, willing to debate whether creationism should be taught alongside evolution in biology class in the 21st century; nor am I willing to debate whether the US should include torture and other war crimes in our rules of engagement. I am willing to debate how we can best use public funds to provide the highest quality education to our nation’s children, and how we can best use our public funds to create a military that is strong enough to keep the nation secure and our soldiers as safe as possible.
Our nation was never perfect, our politicians were never perfect, which is incidentally why our Constitution makes it the national goal “to form a more perfect union,” among other goals. So perhaps it is just the bias of being in the moment without the possibility of rose-tinted nostalgia to soften the edges, but it just seems like politics has grown more petty and vindictive recently and I’ve grown tired of it. We need a significant change in how we approach national discourse and what laws we pass, because government isn’t always the answer, and indeed can sometimes be the problem, but can also be the answer, when the people working at it are working in good faith. Until that happens it seems that we’ll all be mired in the reality that our politics, our politicians, our political discourse are all right in the crapper.